Under the Skin: Gender and Ideology
Throughout the film, we are aligned with the female central character. We are
constantly watching her and watching others, with her. We should consider
what the film wants us to think about her and how it wants us to feel about
her.
Should we see her as a woman? Or as something that is becoming a
person? Or as an inhuman monster?
The film’s ideological position is enigmatic; do we feel anything towards her
as she abandons a baby or when she is murdered at the end? Could such
meanings be open to spectator interpretation?
Is it possible to say that this ambiguous and enigmatic movie has an
ideology? How useful is it to see the film from a feministic or post-colonial
critical approach? Does such an approach lead us into understanding or
appreciating the film any further?
Traditional
gender stereotypes
|
|
Masculine
|
|
Feminine
|
|
Not
aggressive
|
Aggressive
|
Dependent
|
Independent
|
Easily
influenced
|
Not
easily influenced
|
Submissive
|
Dominant
|
Passive
|
Active
|
Home-oriented
|
Worldly
|
Easily
hurt emotionally
|
Not
easily hurt emotionally
|
Indecisive
|
Decisive
|
Talkative
|
Not at
all talkative
|
Gentle
|
Tough
|
Sensitive
to others’ feelings
|
Less
sensitive to others’ feelings
|
Very
desirous of security
|
Not
very desirous of security
|
Cries
a lot
|
Rarely
cries
|
Emotional
|
Logical
|
Verbal
|
Analytical
|
Kind
|
Cruel
|
Tactful
|
Blunt
|
Nurturing
|
Not
nurturing
|
1 How does " the female " in Under the Skin demonstrate,subvert or develop some of these traditional female/male qualities and what is the effect on the audience's positioning and response to her as a character? Give a range of examples.
2
Now look at these reviews for Under the Skin and highlight the main
points made about gender stereotyping in them:
https://rebeccahussein.com/2014/04/12/some-thoughts-on-under-the-skin/
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/mar/15/scarlett-johansson-under-skin-extraterrestrial
http://www.deletionscifi.org/episodes/episode-9/alienating-the-gaze-the-hybrid-femme-fatale-of-under-the-skin/
• These writers do not all
agree about how the film portrays women. In what ways do they disagree?
• Why is Under the Skin more difficult to agree on when discussing gender
representations?
Gender politics and sexual identity issues are at the heart of this film.
Feminist debates about the representation of Johansson’s character have
centred around the idea of female objectification and power. She is
represented and objectified differently in the first half of the film to the
second half. Some feminist readings have seen the film
( particularly the second half) as an exploration of what it is to become a woman in the post-feminist world, whilst others have seen the film as a confirmation of Creed’s ‘Monstrous Feminine’ idea
Further discussion on Creed and horror here
Gender politics and sexual identity issues are at the heart of this film.
Feminist debates about the representation of Johansson’s character have
centred around the idea of female objectification and power. She is
represented and objectified differently in the first half of the film to the
second half. Some feminist readings have seen the film
( particularly the second half) as an exploration of what it is to become a woman in the post-feminist world, whilst others have seen the film as a confirmation of Creed’s ‘Monstrous Feminine’ idea
Further discussion on Creed and horror here
No comments:
Post a Comment